IPFS Gateway DNSLink appears to require a server addressable in DNS (example.com). For this to work, are we required then to have that server accessible in the traditional sense (HA/DR, load balanced, redundancy, etc.) thus breaking the distributed/P2P concept? Can this apparent weakness be explained better?

[bretthacker]

[welcome]

Thank you for submitting your first issue to this repository! A maintainer will be here shortly to triage and review.
In the meantime, please double-check that you have provided all the necessary information to make this process easy! Any information that can help save additiona round trips is useful! We currently aim to give initial feedback within two business days. If this does not happen, feel free to leave a comment.
Please keep an eye on how this issue will be labeled, as labels give an overview of priorities, assignments and additional actions requested by the maintainers:

• "Priority" labels will show how urgent this is for the team.
• "Status" labels will show if this is ready to be worked on, blocked, or in progress.
• "Need" labels will indicate if additional input or analysis is required.

Finally, remember to use https://discuss.ipfs.tech if you just need general support.

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically closed because no description was provided. Please provide us with more information to have this issue reopened.