You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: README.md
+2Lines changed: 2 additions & 0 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ For each of the above operations, we benchmark them in two ways:
38
38
1. Maximum cost - We use a fresh account, and benchmark an unbatched user operation or intent transaction.
39
39
2. Average cost - We use an account that's sent a user operation or intent previously, and the uo/intent is relayed in a batch of 10. The benchmarks calculate total cost, to get unit cost you'd need to divide by 10.
40
40
41
+
We benchmark 2 architectures for Porto accounts. In production today, by default we use: EIP7702 to a 7702Proxy that points to the implementation. We also benchmark the direct EIP7702 to the implementation case, as Ithaca7702Account.
42
+
41
43
Across all benchmarks, the Porto smart account is the cheapest account.
0 commit comments