Skip to content

Commit f23a2a7

Browse files
authored
Create MonoRepoVSMonolith.md
1 parent f6ff990 commit f23a2a7

File tree

1 file changed

+85
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+85
-0
lines changed

LessonLearn/MonoRepoVSMonolith.md

+85
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
1+
### **Monorepo vs Monolith: Key Differences & Use Cases**
2+
3+
Both **Monorepo** and **Monolith** are software development strategies, but they address different concerns. Below is a comparison to clarify their differences.
4+
5+
---
6+
7+
## **1. Monorepo (Monolithic Repository)**
8+
A **monorepo** is a version control strategy where multiple projects or services are stored in a **single** repository. It does not dictate software architecture but instead focuses on how code is organized.
9+
10+
### **Characteristics:**
11+
- **Single Repository**: All services, applications, and libraries exist in a single Git repository.
12+
- **Independent Builds & Deployments**: Even though code is in one repo, services or modules can be built, tested, and deployed independently.
13+
- **Shared Dependencies**: Shared code and libraries are maintained centrally, reducing duplication.
14+
- **Unified Versioning**: Single versioning strategy across all components.
15+
16+
### **Advantages:**
17+
**Easier Code Sharing** – Common libraries are in one place, reducing duplication.
18+
**Consistency** – All services follow the same development rules and dependencies.
19+
**Refactoring Ease** – Changes across multiple services can be done in a single commit.
20+
**Better CI/CD** – Simplifies dependency management and ensures atomic commits.
21+
22+
### **Disadvantages:**
23+
**Scalability Issues** – Large repos can slow down Git performance.
24+
**Complex CI/CD** – Running tests/builds for the whole repo can be slow.
25+
**Access Control Challenges** – Fine-grained permissions are harder to implement.
26+
27+
### **Examples:**
28+
- Google, Facebook, and Twitter use monorepos.
29+
- Large-scale projects like Bazel (Google’s build tool) facilitate monorepo development.
30+
31+
---
32+
33+
## **2. Monolith (Monolithic Architecture)**
34+
A **monolith** is a **software architecture pattern** where all business logic, UI, and data access layers exist in a **single** codebase and are deployed as a single unit.
35+
36+
### **Characteristics:**
37+
- **Single Application**: Everything (backend, frontend, database) is part of one executable.
38+
- **Tightly Coupled Components**: Different modules depend on each other within the same codebase.
39+
- **Unified Deployment**: Updates require deploying the entire application, even for small changes.
40+
- **Centralized Database**: Typically relies on one large database.
41+
42+
### **Advantages:**
43+
**Easier to Develop & Debug** – Everything is in one place.
44+
**Performance** – No network latency from inter-service communication.
45+
**Simple Deployment** – One build artifact, fewer moving parts.
46+
**Security** – Centralized authentication and data handling.
47+
48+
### **Disadvantages:**
49+
**Scalability Issues** – Scaling requires replicating the entire app instead of individual services.
50+
**Harder to Maintain** – A large codebase with multiple concerns can become unmanageable.
51+
**Longer Deployment Times** – Small changes require redeploying the entire system.
52+
**Technology Lock-in** – Cannot easily introduce new technologies without modifying the whole system.
53+
54+
### **Examples:**
55+
- Traditional enterprise applications.
56+
- Early versions of apps like eBay and Amazon before they transitioned to microservices.
57+
58+
---
59+
60+
## **Summary Table:**
61+
| Feature | Monorepo 🏗️ | Monolith 🏛️ |
62+
|--------------|-----------|----------|
63+
| Definition | A single repository for multiple projects. | A single codebase where all features and logic reside. |
64+
| Focus | Code organization (version control strategy). | Application architecture. |
65+
| Scalability | Can handle large projects but may slow Git performance. | Hard to scale due to tight coupling. |
66+
| Deployment | Services can be deployed independently. | The whole application is deployed together. |
67+
| Flexibility | Supports microservices and modular development. | Uses a single technology stack. |
68+
| Maintenance | Easier to refactor shared code. | Can become difficult to maintain as the codebase grows. |
69+
70+
---
71+
72+
## **Can a Monorepo Contain a Monolith?**
73+
Yes! A monorepo can **contain** a monolith, but not all monorepos are monoliths.
74+
Similarly, a monolith **can** exist in a monorepo or a multi-repo setup.
75+
76+
### **Which One Should You Use?**
77+
- **Use a Monorepo** if:
78+
- You have multiple related projects (microservices, frontend, backend) that share code.
79+
- You want better dependency management and unified versioning.
80+
- Your team is comfortable with advanced CI/CD pipelines.
81+
82+
- **Use a Monolith** if:
83+
- Your application is small to medium-sized and does not need microservices.
84+
- You want simplicity in deployment and development.
85+
- You prioritize performance over flexibility.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)