Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
83 lines (57 loc) · 2.34 KB

WG-09-12.md

File metadata and controls

83 lines (57 loc) · 2.34 KB
Raw

WebAssembly logo

Agenda for the September 12 video call of WebAssembly's Working Group

  • Where: zoom.us
  • When: September 12, 2018 at 3pm-4pm UTC ( September 12, 2018 8am-9am PT )
  • Location: on calendar invite to registered attendees
  • Contact:

Registration

If you are a Working Group member no registration is required.

If you are a Community Group member who would like to observe, please register here: https://goo.gl/forms/HD2kLCM0iSKk7AVl1

Logistics

The meeting will be on a zoom.us video conference. Installation is required, see the calendar invite.

Agenda items

  1. Opening, welcome and roll call
    1. Opening of the meeting
    2. Introduction of attendees
  2. Find volunteers for note taking (chair to volunteer).
  3. Adoption of the agenda
  4. Proposals and discussions
  5. Future meetings
    1. Confirm next meeting date + time.
  6. Closure

Agenda items for future meetings

None.

Schedule constraints

None.

Meeting Notes

Introduction of attendees

  • Ben Smith
  • Ben Titzer
  • Conrad Watt
  • Gordon Aplin
  • Ulrik Sorber

Proposals and discussions

BS: Brief description of current status of Working Draft. The proposed document is available as a PR against the spec repo. Includes fine-grained changes, found by diffing HTML between editor's drafts and previous working draft. In the future we'll want to provide more coarse-grained changes for proposals, but this is fine for now.

BT: Are there any deadlines to be aware of?

BS: No, the only real deadline is that we are required to put out a draft at least every 6 months, or say why we didn't. But we still have a month or so. There is no deadline for the CR, since we're already long over the time were "resetting the clock" would make a difference.

BS: Putting out the new WD is the path the next CR. The only real constraint there is making sure that our implementations pass the testsuite. We currently do, but if there are tests that are added in the meantime that are non-compliant, we'll have to redo the CR.

BT: Yeah, there are some issues with the implementation limits in some engines.

BS: Are those in the document?

BT: I handed that off to Dan Ehrenberg, not sure if he's landed it yet.

BS: OK, we may want to wait until that is landed before we push for CR.

Closure