Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Produce 2.0 build #4

Open
rrouse opened this issue Feb 3, 2014 · 5 comments
Open

Feature Request: Produce 2.0 build #4

rrouse opened this issue Feb 3, 2014 · 5 comments

Comments

@rrouse
Copy link

rrouse commented Feb 3, 2014

2.0 beta is now available on the upstream repository. It has a rewritten core to handle timezones through moment.

It might be a good idea to get this branch inline as well.

@jph303
Copy link

jph303 commented Mar 24, 2014

Are there any updates on this front? Any timelines on when this might be possible?

@rrouse
Copy link
Author

rrouse commented Mar 24, 2014

@jph303 My boss emailed the author and the author said that he doesn't need any of the improvements in 2.0, so he has no plans currently to do it.

@jph303
Copy link

jph303 commented Mar 24, 2014

@rrouse thanks for your quick response, do you know if Adam Shaw has ever entertained the idea of adding the resource view to the main branch of fullcalendar? We have a requirement to use both modes and would be interested on trying to contribute to a merger.

@rrouse
Copy link
Author

rrouse commented Mar 24, 2014

@jph303 Jarno's fork probably came around because of Issue 150 on FullCalendar's Google Code issue list

https://code.google.com/p/fullcalendar/issues/detail?id=150&colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Milestone%20Summary%20Stars

It's been around since 2009. It's listed as "accepted", but as far as I know, no attempt has been made to fully integrate.

We ended up forgoing FullCalendar in its entirety and went with DHTMLX Scheduler. It has everything built in, but doesn't do timezones. I ended up working around that in my backend code, so it works for our purposes.

@jph303
Copy link

jph303 commented Mar 24, 2014

@rrouse Thanks for the info, very helpful.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants