Replies: 3 comments
-
|
CheckDigitIncreaseConsistency activated? Then deactivate it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
Ok, it was enabled and I have disabled it right now. Let's see how it behaves. Thank you for the hint! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
Works perfect now, thanks! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Issue
Hi,
I am using v16.0.0. Post-processing is set to check max rate > 0,05 (default?).
I get "Rate too high" errors, although the data recognition seems to work perfectly and the max rates are not exceeded. Here an extract of the data (which I also fully enclose):
2025-06-22T04:27:23+0200,main,00005.1987,5.0987,5.0987,0.000160,0.0008,no error,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,5.0,1.0,9.0,8.8,7.8
2025-06-22T04:32:23+0200,main,00005.2345,,5.0987,,0.0000,Rate too high - Read: 5.2345 - Pre: 5.0987 - Rate: 0.1358,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,5.0,2.0,3.0,4.5,5.2
My interpretation is that at 04:27:23 the new previous value has not been updated in spite of a perfect reading. Consequently, at 04:32:23 the raw value is compared to the previous value, which in this case is not the last but last last value. And this results in a "Rate too high" error.
Is this interpretation correct? Why is the previous value not updated? Are there other solutions or workarounds other than disabling the max rate control, which I think is needed?
Thanks in advance!
David
data_2025-06-22.csv
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions