You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is more of a question with a potential follow-up suggestion: in the genre column, we do have drama/thriller and thriller/drama
Is there a valid reason behind this? If not, I would suggest making it more consistent (eg: pick one between the two and use it consistently across the list), so that sorting it properly groups them.
Also: since we do have categories already, why the column at all? It seems redundant to me, I would maybe instead replace that with a different rating source maybe (rotten tomatoes?)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I agree with both your suggestions @samuele-mattiuzzo. I'll put this issue up for grabs. Let's focus on getting rid of the categories column for now and consider adding a different rating source in a new issue.
Happy to take care of this, fancy assigning it to me? I'll clean up all the discrepancies and pick one of either (as I suspect order of tags/categories doesn't truly matter)
This is more of a question with a potential follow-up suggestion: in the genre column, we do have
drama/thriller
andthriller/drama
Is there a valid reason behind this? If not, I would suggest making it more consistent (eg: pick one between the two and use it consistently across the list), so that sorting it properly groups them.
Also: since we do have categories already, why the column at all? It seems redundant to me, I would maybe instead replace that with a different rating source maybe (rotten tomatoes?)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: