Clarify licenses in package manifests

[mk-pmb]

Hi! I just discovered that lots of sub packages had licenses already, and we forgot to update them in #75:

$ git grep -nFe '"license":' | sed -re 's~/~ ~;s~[",]~~g;s~^(\S+) .*: ([^:]+)$~\2\t\1~' | sort -V
AGPL-2.0        anno-server
ISC     anno-cli
ISC     anno-errors
ISC     anno-fixtures
ISC     anno-plugins
ISC     anno-queries
ISC     anno-schema
ISC     anno-store
ISC     anno-store-file
ISC     anno-store-memory
ISC     anno-store-mongodb
ISC     anno-store-mongolike
ISC     anno-store-sql
ISC     anno-test
ISC     anno-util
ISC     anno-util-loaders
ISC     anno-webpack
MIT     anno-auth-server
MIT     anno-store-http

Could you publish a branch based on 3cb40c5 that adds a commit that prefixes most of them with MIT OR ? To do that with sed:

sed -re 's~("license": ")([^M])~\1MIT OR \2~' -i -- */package.json

Also would be nice to declare the MIT license in the top level package.json.

I'll then rebase my branches onto the one with fixed license declarations.

[mk-pmb]

However, the dual licensing might confuse some people. For people not experienced in licensing, a (mistaken) idea of having to resolve the unequal restrictions might be a burden to contribution. In case you prefer MIT only, the sed command would be:

sed -re 's~("license": ")[^"]+~\1MIT~' -i -- */package.json

My current tendency is to probably restrict my branches to MIT anyway.

[mk-pmb]

Is there anything I can do to help you here? Unfortunately I cannot make a PR for you because you merely accepting it would be too weak a license statement, at least for my current understanding.