You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Looking at the code it seems possible to bond any ERC20.
I'm wondering if it's possible to have a isMinKeeper check with a bond requirement of multiple coins
e.g. 1 kp3r + 1 gov token from X project.
So that a keeper job can require a keeper to have both kp3r and the gov token of the project the function is called on for incentivization alignment.
This mechanism could also be used as a registration / test / MACI for advisors and contributors.
Curious if this is supported / planned / possible?
Or some reason it's a bad idea?
Is an implementation the blocker? Front end / contract or both? Any guidance would be appreciated.
Hi!
Looking at the code it seems possible to bond any ERC20.
I'm wondering if it's possible to have a
isMinKeeper
check with a bond requirement of multiple coinse.g. 1 kp3r + 1 gov token from X project.
So that a keeper job can require a keeper to have both kp3r and the gov token of the project the function is called on for incentivization alignment.
This mechanism could also be used as a registration / test / MACI for advisors and contributors.
Curious if this is supported / planned / possible?
Or some reason it's a bad idea?
Is an implementation the blocker? Front end / contract or both? Any guidance would be appreciated.
ping! sorry for the spam @andrecronje @Soleone @Soleone @matjaz @Macarse @xiaojay @fameal @RomanHiden @Macarse @mwalol @cleanunicorn
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: