Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add RAJA check for dereferencing struct pointers in a RAJA loop #8

Open
bryujin opened this issue Jun 24, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Add RAJA check for dereferencing struct pointers in a RAJA loop #8

bryujin opened this issue Jun 24, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@bryujin
Copy link

bryujin commented Jun 24, 2020

This would be a check to see if a RAJA lambda has captured a pointer to a struct and then dereferences it within the kernel. This is the same basic problem that we have when implicitly dereferencing members off of the "this" pointer.

So something like:

struct mystruct* mystruct_ptr = ... ;

struct mystruct mystruct_captured = ...;

RAJA::for_all (RAJA::RangeSegment(0, n, [=](int i) {
...
data[i] += mystruct_ptr->myfield; // catch this dereference

data[i] += mystruct_captured.myfield; // this shouldn't be caught since it's not a pointer dereference
...
} );

@calewis
Copy link

calewis commented Jun 24, 2020

Kokkos could also use this check. @bryujin how does RAJA feel about allowing pointer dereferences in lambdas in general? Are some types designed explicitly as wrappers similar to Kokkos::View or are certain dereferences allowed?

@bryujin
Copy link
Author

bryujin commented Jun 24, 2020

It's very common to have derefences for simple types, such as arrays of doubles, ints, etc, so I would advocate a general flagging of pointer dereferencing. RAJA does not require the use of a Views construct, and generally relies on the user to get their data to the appropriate memory space.

For my use case, structs are usually holding metadata and are unlikely to be moving back and forth between memory spaces.

crtrott pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 13, 2023
…tput

The crash happens in clang::driver::tools::SplitDebugName when Output is
InputInfo::Nothing. It doesn't happen with standalone clang driver because
output is created in Driver::BuildJobsForActionNoCache.

Example backtrace:
```
* thread #1, name = 'clangd', stop reason = hit program assert
  * frame #0: 0x00007ffff5c4eacf libc.so.6`raise + 271
    frame #1: 0x00007ffff5c21ea5 libc.so.6`abort + 295
    frame #2: 0x00007ffff5c21d79 libc.so.6`__assert_fail_base.cold.0 + 15
    frame #3: 0x00007ffff5c47426 libc.so.6`__assert_fail + 70
    frame #4: 0x000055555dc0923c clangd`clang::driver::InputInfo::getFilename(this=0x00007fffffff9398) const at InputInfo.h:84:5
    frame #5: 0x000055555dcd0d8d clangd`clang::driver::tools::SplitDebugName(JA=0x000055555f6c6a50, Args=0x000055555f6d0b80, Input=0x00007fffffff9678, Output=0x00007fffffff9398) at CommonArgs.cpp:1275:40
    frame #6: 0x000055555dc955a5 clangd`clang::driver::tools::Clang::ConstructJob(this=0x000055555f6c69d0, C=0x000055555f6c64a0, JA=0x000055555f6c6a50, Output=0x00007fffffff9398, Inputs=0x00007fffffff9668, Args=0x000055555f6d0b80, LinkingOutput=0x0000000000000000) const at Clang.cpp:5690:33
    frame #7: 0x000055555dbf6b54 clangd`clang::driver::Driver::BuildJobsForActionNoCache(this=0x00007fffffffb5e0, C=0x000055555f6c64a0, A=0x000055555f6c6a50, TC=0x000055555f6c4be0, BoundArch=(Data = 0x0000000000000000, Length = 0), AtTopLevel=true, MultipleArchs=false, LinkingOutput=0x0000000000000000, CachedResults=size=1, TargetDeviceOffloadKind=OFK_None) const at Driver.cpp:5618:10
    frame #8: 0x000055555dbf4ef0 clangd`clang::driver::Driver::BuildJobsForAction(this=0x00007fffffffb5e0, C=0x000055555f6c64a0, A=0x000055555f6c6a50, TC=0x000055555f6c4be0, BoundArch=(Data = 0x0000000000000000, Length = 0), AtTopLevel=true, MultipleArchs=false, LinkingOutput=0x0000000000000000, CachedResults=size=1, TargetDeviceOffloadKind=OFK_None) const at Driver.cpp:5306:26
    frame #9: 0x000055555dbeb590 clangd`clang::driver::Driver::BuildJobs(this=0x00007fffffffb5e0, C=0x000055555f6c64a0) const at Driver.cpp:4844:5
    frame #10: 0x000055555dbe6b0f clangd`clang::driver::Driver::BuildCompilation(this=0x00007fffffffb5e0, ArgList=ArrayRef<const char *> @ 0x00007fffffffb268) at Driver.cpp:1496:3
    frame #11: 0x000055555b0cc0d9 clangd`clang::createInvocation(ArgList=ArrayRef<const char *> @ 0x00007fffffffbb38, Opts=CreateInvocationOptions @ 0x00007fffffffbb90) at CreateInvocationFromCommandLine.cpp:53:52
    frame #12: 0x000055555b378e7b clangd`clang::clangd::buildCompilerInvocation(Inputs=0x00007fffffffca58, D=0x00007fffffffc158, CC1Args=size=0) at Compiler.cpp:116:44
    frame #13: 0x000055555895a6c8 clangd`clang::clangd::(anonymous namespace)::Checker::buildInvocation(this=0x00007fffffffc760, TFS=0x00007fffffffe570, Contents= Has Value=false ) at Check.cpp:212:9
    frame #14: 0x0000555558959cec clangd`clang::clangd::check(File=(Data = "build/test.cpp", Length = 64), TFS=0x00007fffffffe570, Opts=0x00007fffffffe600) at Check.cpp:486:34
    frame #15: 0x000055555892164a clangd`main(argc=4, argv=0x00007fffffffecd8) at ClangdMain.cpp:993:12
    frame #16: 0x00007ffff5c3ad85 libc.so.6`__libc_start_main + 229
    frame #17: 0x00005555585bbe9e clangd`_start + 46
```

Test Plan: ninja ClangDriverTests && tools/clang/unittests/Driver/ClangDriverTests

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154602
crtrott pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 31, 2023
This reverts commit 0e63f1a.

clang-format started to crash with contents like:
a.h:
```
```
$ clang-format a.h
```
PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace.
Stack dump:
0.      Program arguments: ../llvm/build/bin/clang-format a.h
 #0 0x0000560b689fe177 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&, int) /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:723:13
 #1 0x0000560b689fbfbe llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/llvm/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:106:18
 #2 0x0000560b689feaca SignalHandler(int) /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/llvm/lib/Support/Unix/Signals.inc:413:1
 #3 0x00007f030405a540 (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x3c540)
 #4 0x0000560b68a9a980 is /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/clang/include/clang/Lex/Token.h:98:44
 #5 0x0000560b68a9a980 is /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/clang/lib/Format/FormatToken.h:562:51
 #6 0x0000560b68a9a980 startsSequenceInternal<clang::tok::TokenKind, clang::tok::TokenKind> /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/clang/lib/Format/FormatToken.h:831:9
 #7 0x0000560b68a9a980 startsSequence<clang::tok::TokenKind, clang::tok::TokenKind> /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/clang/lib/Format/FormatToken.h:600:12
 #8 0x0000560b68a9a980 getFunctionName /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp:3131:17
 #9 0x0000560b68a9a980 clang::format::TokenAnnotator::annotate(clang::format::AnnotatedLine&) /usr/local/google/home/kadircet/repos/llvm/clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp:3191:17
Segmentation fault
```
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants