You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi there! Love this project and the need for a universal load balancer outside of cloud load balancers.
I've been testing the akrobateo load balancers on a GKE cluster which has 3 worker nodes. It seems that since the cluster has multiple worker nodes that when a service of type:LoadBalancer is created, akrobateo will in turn spin up 3 pods and expose the service port on 3 External IP addresses.
Is there a way with the akrobateo project to act more like a true load balancer where even in a larger worker node cluster the kubernetes service of type:LoadBalancer is only given a single external IP address which acts as the sole entry point into the cluster? Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As arobateo really "just" deploys a IP forwarding rule, deploying it on only single node will give you a SPOF. Hence the default functionality to deploy the LB pods (just the iptable forwarding rule basically) as DaemonSet. Also akrobateo does not have any capability to get a true VIP for the LB service like those cloud LB implementations have.
I opened one issue long time ago to look at some configurability for the behaviour: #16
Hi there! Love this project and the need for a universal load balancer outside of cloud load balancers.
I've been testing the akrobateo load balancers on a GKE cluster which has 3 worker nodes. It seems that since the cluster has multiple worker nodes that when a service of type:LoadBalancer is created, akrobateo will in turn spin up 3 pods and expose the service port on 3 External IP addresses.
Is there a way with the akrobateo project to act more like a true load balancer where even in a larger worker node cluster the kubernetes service of type:LoadBalancer is only given a single external IP address which acts as the sole entry point into the cluster? Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: