-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 107
Description
After implementing the demo example I have reached a roadblock. In the intro example the routes seem to have a 1 to 1 relation between route and action.
const routes = [
{
path: '', // optional
action: () => `<h1>Home</h1>`,
},
{
path: '/posts',
action: () => console.log('checking child routes for /posts'),
children: [
{
path: '', // optional, matches both "/posts" and "/posts/"
action: () => `<h1>Posts</h1>`,
},
{
path: '/:id',
action: (context) => `<h1>Post #${context.params.id}</h1>`,
},
],
},
];
I am used to building nested components that have a router outlet (Angular 2) or match components (React). For example I would have a nesting like this:
<chapter-cmp>
<h1>Chapter title</h1>
...
<lesson>
<h1>Lesson title</h1>
...
</lesson>
</chapter-cmp>
<sidebar>
<p>Open almost all the time except for a few routes</p>
</sidebar>
How do I feed the corresponding data for each layer of the app? Currently I am not aware how can I get the ids from parents of nested routes without having to create monolitic routes like these path: '/:course/:chapter/:lesson'
. I thought that I can just fire actions in the state store that will be received by the components. But than what if I move to another section of the app where I need to tear-down some components and instantiate others. '/blog/:category/:posts'`.