-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 77
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Discussion: how many kubernetes versions should we support directly? #23
Comments
For example, what other versions should actually be included in #22 ? |
A few notes:
|
That being said, can we safely use the oldest possible kubectl and only release one docker image per the project version, not per kubectl? If I remember correctly, I think it was me who introduced the current versioning scheme for
|
It was me that introduced the current naming, I think.. 😉 Happy to switch to a semver scheme like you propose. Version increments
Correct? |
As we generate images based both on the kubectl version (directly tied to the Kubernetes release version) and the version of this tool, we need to decide how many versions of Kubernetes we should support.
I mean the MINOR version numbers - so, for example, LATEST is currently
1.13.4
, LATEST-1 is1.12.6
- at time of writing.My suggestion is to support LATEST, LATEST-1, LATEST-2 at their highest PATCH version level.
This would involve creating version branches for the MINOR k8s, and applying tags in these branches, after backporting new features.
We would create branches
1.13
,1.12
, and1.11
and figure out the easiest way to port changes to them.Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: