Deploying langflow at scale #10680
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
We’re running into many of the same challenges when trying to deploy Langflow at scale, particularly around exposing flows reliably as MCP servers across multiple replicas and managing their configurations. Specifically: We’ve also seen issues with flows/MCP server configurations not persisting across pods when running with the official Helm chart (e.g., ephemeral configs when pods restart or scale), which makes it hard to serve flows consistently. There’s a strong need to expose flows as stable MCP tools, ideally with integration baked into the Helm chart or deployment manifests so that we don’t lose tool registrations on scaling. Current defaults appear geared more toward development than production use. We also need OAuth-based authentication support for securing access to Langflow (both API/MCP), beyond simple API keys, to enable enterprise use cases and integrations with identity providers. Recent releases do mention OAuth support in documentation for MCP servers, but production-ready guidance/examples would help. Has anyone successfully deployed a fully persistent and scalable Langflow + MCP setup (e.g., with centralized state storage, consistent MCP exposure, and OAuth authentication) in Kubernetes with Helm? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi all,
I’m trying to deploy Langflow in production on Kubernetes using the official Helm chart. I’m running into several issues, especially when deploying the backend and frontend separately:
Questions:
Image used is v1.6.8 and also tried to build v1.7.0 from main branch.
Thanks!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions