Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reassess Stacks transaction fees #5930

Open
314159265359879 opened this issue Oct 30, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Reassess Stacks transaction fees #5930

314159265359879 opened this issue Oct 30, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
area:fees enhancement-p1 Critical functionality needed by many users, with no clear alternatives

Comments

@314159265359879
Copy link
Contributor

314159265359879 commented Oct 30, 2024

Problem: Users feel they are overpaying fees

Feature: Stacks transaction fee calculation

Scenario: A user wants to send a standard token transfer

When the user goes to send STX tokens

Then the estimated low fees are as low as is reasonable for the transaction to be processed.

Then the estimated normal fees are as low as is reasonable for the transaction to be processed quickly.

Then the estimated high fees are as low as is reasonable for the transaction to be processed in the next block.

@314159265359879 314159265359879 added area:fees enhancement-p1 Critical functionality needed by many users, with no clear alternatives labels Oct 30, 2024
Copy link

linear bot commented Oct 30, 2024

@camerow camerow changed the title To consider: Wallet max. fee setting for STX transfers Reasses Stacks fees in the extension Nov 4, 2024
@camerow camerow changed the title Reasses Stacks fees in the extension Reassess Stacks fees in the extension Nov 4, 2024
@camerow camerow changed the title Reassess Stacks fees in the extension Reassess Stacks transaction fees Nov 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:fees enhancement-p1 Critical functionality needed by many users, with no clear alternatives
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant