Replies: 1 comment 11 replies
-
| I think the word "defining" is not right here. It would be a new implementation for a new backend. And that typically requires writing native code. The existing backends written in C++ all follow the same structure, but obviously every backend needs different code to interact with a virtual camera. So, someone would have to write a backend that can talk to the akv virtual camera. I'm assuming you're referring to the macOS/Windows one from https://github.com/webcamoid/akvirtualcamera. How that code will look like and how easy it is will become clear at implementation time. Any reason why you can't use the other available backends? | 
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
                  
                    11 replies
                  
                
            
  
    Sign up for free
    to join this conversation on GitHub.
    Already have an account?
    Sign in to comment
  
        
    
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I've been playing with pyvirtualcam for the past couple of weeks and I'm currently facing the challenge of handling two virtual cameras that are not supported by the built in backends.
Unfortunately, I'm not able to figure out how to define in python other virtual cameras.
I've looked at the built in ones and they are all in cpp and there are no examples on how to create my custom cameras.
Btw, I'm using AkVCam to create new virtual devices.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions