-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
logarithmic histogram bins #84
Labels
enhancement
New feature or request
Comments
A follow-on idea: it should “detect” when the histogram counts are so diverse in magnitude that they should be shown logarithmically too. I think we want to maximise the entropy (i.e. information content) of the GRAPH, so if p_i is the height of the graph then the entropy of the graph is sum_i p_i log (p_i). This can be calculated for p_i = histogram count, p_i = log(histogram count), I think we can even use this heuristic for deciding whether the bins should be linear or logarithmic (the original topic of this issue).
…-- Gábor
Gábor Csányi
Professor of Molecular Modelling
Engineering Laboratory, University of Cambridge
Pembroke College Cambridge
Pembroke College supports CARA. A Lifeline to Academics at Risk. http://www.cara.ngo/
On 24 Feb 2020, at 11:17, Tamas Stenczel ***@***.***> wrote:
add option to look set up logarithmic bins in histogram with summary.
for example: if I have a dataset with GAP errors, I am interested in their order of magnitude mainly, would plot them logarithmically and not linerarly in a histogram. The following is shown at the moment which is not very meaningful.
abs_error count: 426 min: 9.3100e-05 med: 5.7787e-02 max: 9.4018e-01 std: 7.5239e-02 var: 5.6609e-03
▉▉▉▉▉▉▉▉▉▉▉▉▉▉▉▉▉▉▉▉▉▉▉▉▉▉▉▉▉▉▉▉▉▉▉▉▉▉▉▉ 351 [ 9.3100e-05, 0.0941)
▉▉▉▉▉▉▉ 63 [ 9.4102e-02, 0.1881)
7 [ 1.8811e-01, 0.2821)
2 [ 2.8212e-01, 0.3761)
0 [ 3.7613e-01, 0.4701)
1 [ 4.7014e-01, 0.5641)
1 [ 5.6415e-01, 0.6582)
0 [ 6.5815e-01, 0.7522)
0 [ 7.5216e-01, 0.8462)
1 [ 8.4617e-01, 0.9402)```
I understand that we can add a new property with the current functionality, but I cannot do that in the visualiser for example (could code it there as well though) and is not that straightforward for a first time user
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
|
that is a good idea, can surely do it! I think the sensible design is to have options first for |
yes, that was exactly how I thought about it too
…-- Gábor
Gábor Csányi
Professor of Molecular Modelling
Engineering Laboratory, University of Cambridge
Pembroke College Cambridge
Pembroke College supports CARA. A Lifeline to Academics at Risk. http://www.cara.ngo/
On 24 Feb 2020, at 14:36, Tamas Stenczel ***@***.***> wrote:
that is a good idea, can surely do it!
I think the sensible design is to have options first for --liner and --log with the logic behind and then add --auto which does this automtically, perhaps making the latter the default
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
|
but you want to separate —linear-bin and —linear-count
…-- Gábor
Gábor Csányi
Professor of Molecular Modelling
Engineering Laboratory, University of Cambridge
Pembroke College Cambridge
Pembroke College supports CARA. A Lifeline to Academics at Risk. http://www.cara.ngo/
On 24 Feb 2020, at 14:44, Gabor Csanyi ***@***.***> wrote:
yes, that was exactly how I thought about it too
-- Gábor
Gábor Csányi
Professor of Molecular Modelling
Engineering Laboratory, University of Cambridge
Pembroke College Cambridge
Pembroke College supports CARA. A Lifeline to Academics at Risk. http://www.cara.ngo/
> On 24 Feb 2020, at 14:36, Tamas Stenczel ***@***.***> wrote:
>
> that is a good idea, can surely do it!
>
> I think the sensible design is to have options first for --liner and --log with the logic behind and then add --auto which does this automtically, perhaps making the latter the default
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you commented.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
>
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
add option to look set up logarithmic bins in histogram with summary.
for example: if I have a dataset with GAP errors, I am interested in their order of magnitude mainly, would plot them logarithmically and not linerarly in a histogram. The following is shown at the moment which is not very meaningful.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: