Skip to content

Discuss PostgreSQL yaml #6

@pierreozoux

Description

@pierreozoux

This is the proposal for the YAML of the CRD.

I have a first doubt, defining a standard like an ingress, or a pvc resource, we can be really conservative and keep only the 1% of commonality between different implementation or try to abstract 99% of the underlying implementation. I think our main challenge here is to find the right balance between these 2 extreme.
I think the current yaml is at one end of the spectrum, trying to abstract everything, I'd love your comments about that.

And please mention the high level keys you'd like to get rid of, because you think they don't make sense at all, and the reasoning behind.

I'd love to make this alpha in 1.16.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions