Skip to content

[Extensions] Support higher level webauthn extensions #82

@msirringhaus

Description

@msirringhaus

We should also process WebAuthn extensions. These are defined as client extensions, so they should fit right in - we can possibly prefix these with WebAuthn (eg. WebAuthnPRFExtension for my favourite extension, Pseudo-random function extension (prf).

Originally posted by @AlfioEmanueleFresta in #77 (comment)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions