Combined Community and More Resources pages. #314
+140
−130
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Dave Welsch <[email protected]>
dwelsch-esi
requested review from
divya-mohan0209,
ksatchit and
k8s-dev
as code owners
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
✅ Deploy Preview for docs-litmuschaos ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
namkyu1999
requested changes
Dec 19, 2024
website/versioned_docs/version-3.12.0/introduction/community.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Dave Welsch <[email protected]>
namkyu1999
approved these changes
Dec 20, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this PR does / why we need it:
Removes a redundant page. Makes finding community and information resources more friendly.
Which issue this PR fixes
fixes #309
Special notes for your reviewer:
This is one of the CNCF doc issues with the techdoc-analysis label.
Checklist:
documentationtag