Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Slight misjudgement in B126 #116

Open
ThePokerDude opened this issue Mar 6, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Slight misjudgement in B126 #116

ThePokerDude opened this issue Mar 6, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
Training needed Better training data needed

Comments

@ThePokerDude
Copy link
Contributor

Instead of bidding 3NT N should pass for penalty.
North does not even consider passing.

Bid: 3N by Simulation
Candidates:
Bid: 3N, Expected score: 307, NN Score: 0.188, Adjusted: 9
Bid: 2N, Expected score: 147, NN Score: 0.114, Adjusted: 6
Bid: 3D, Expected score: 94, NN Score: 0.644, Adjusted: 32
image

@ThorvaldAagaard
Copy link
Collaborator

ThorvaldAagaard commented Mar 6, 2024

Could be right - could be wrong.
This is from the actual matches
image

EdwardPiwowar/BBA#252

@ThorvaldAagaard ThorvaldAagaard added the Training needed Better training data needed label Mar 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Training needed Better training data needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants