Ben misses opportunity for splinter bid

[ThePokerDude]

instead of 4s Ben should bid 4h

[Event ""]
[Site ""]
[Date ""]
[Board "172"]
[Dealer "W"]
[Vulnerable "NS"]
[Deal "W:KJ63.J.AK53.AQT2 T.Q96542.JT4.J94 Q982.A83.986.865 A754.KT7.Q72.K73"]
[Scoring ""]
[BCFlags "1f"]
[Generator "BridgeComposer Version 5.104.1"]
[South "WBridge5"]
[West "ben0308p5dd"]
[North "WBridge5"]
[East "ben0308p5dd"]
[Declarer "E"]
[Contract "4S"]
[Result "10"]
{PAR of the deal: 4S = played by East : 420 points}
{PAR computation time: 00'03"}
{Feasability: 4 4 8 3 4 9 9 5 10 8 4 4 8 3 4 9 9 5 10 8 }
[Auction "W"]
1D Pass 1S Pass
4S Pass Pass Pass
[Play "S"]
sa SK st S2
s4 S6 h6 S8
d2 DA d4 D8
h7 HJ h2 HA
ht S3 h4 H8
d7 DK dt D6
dq D5 dj D9
c3 CQ c4 C6
s5 SJ h5 SQ
s7 C2 h9 S9
c7 CA c9 C5
hk D3 cj H3
ck CT hq C8

[ThorvaldAagaard]

The neural network agree

but simulation doesn't

The better the net, the more we should trust the net, but it is still to difficult to decide when - because a high score can be because we have few examples or because it is the right bid.

I won't do anything by this for now.