Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OAK-D-LR imuExtrinsics not merged #86

Open
dylan-gonzalez opened this issue Apr 28, 2024 · 7 comments
Open

OAK-D-LR imuExtrinsics not merged #86

dylan-gonzalez opened this issue Apr 28, 2024 · 7 comments
Assignees

Comments

@dylan-gonzalez
Copy link

dylan-gonzalez commented Apr 28, 2024

How come the adding_IMU_tmp branch hasn't been merged? It has the commit that adds the imuExtrinsics, which I need to use to define the tf camera_link -> imu_link for the oak-d-lr here. Just curious as to why it hasn't been merged.

Also, how do I know what IMU my OAK-D-LR has? In the depthai hardware docs, it says that it has a BNO085, but on the shop page it says it has a BNO086.

@themarpe
Copy link
Contributor

@dylan-gonzalez its WIP, we are working on adding the spec extrinsics directly to FW, with this branch supplementing it from "at calibration time".

Also, how do I know what IMU my OAK-D-LR has? In the depthai hardware docs, it says that it has a BNO085, but on the shop page it says it has a BNO086.

These two IMUs differ only in FW version. BNO086 should be same as BNO085 with updated FW. We update the FW, so should be treated as BNO086

@dylan-gonzalez
Copy link
Author

Do you have covariance values for the BNO086? When I run the depthai_ros_driver, the covariance values are all zeros.

@themarpe
Copy link
Contributor

themarpe commented May 6, 2024

@Serafadam do we have those available?

@Serafadam
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, unfortunately currently those values are not provided in the datasheets and firmware, though they should be added after the IMU calibration process updates.

@dylan-gonzalez
Copy link
Author

When will that be?

@dylan-gonzalez
Copy link
Author

So is it safe to use these extrinsics (which are for the BNO084) for the BNO086 in the OAK-D-LR?

@themarpe
Copy link
Contributor

@Serafadam do you mind verifying? Also is OAK-D-LR now also included?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants