Is it dangerous to handle 'policy' like this?

[shlyakpavel]

qps/src/dialogs.cpp

Line 326 in 96144f4

switch (policy)

Policy is not enum. Integer may get any value and cause rb undefined. This may lead to garbage pointer dereference. My proposal is to make SCHED_OTHER default case to ensure that never happens.

[shlyakpavel]

I'm not good enouth with this code so not making a PR now

[tsujan]

Yes, a default is missing.

I don't remember what was in this file; should read it again.