Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Compare variables by conversion or keyed matching #18

Open
pi8027 opened this issue Oct 1, 2021 · 6 comments
Open

Compare variables by conversion or keyed matching #18

pi8027 opened this issue Oct 1, 2021 · 6 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@pi8027
Copy link
Member

pi8027 commented Oct 1, 2021

Although it may lead to some performance issues.

@pi8027 pi8027 added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 1, 2021
@gares
Copy link
Member

gares commented Oct 1, 2021

you can pass the tactic an option in that case

@pi8027
Copy link
Member Author

pi8027 commented Oct 6, 2021

@gares I think now I need to do the same for the second item of #22 (comment), and it would be nice if we can set/unset these options globally. Do you think it is possible?

@gares
Copy link
Member

gares commented Oct 6, 2021

Hum, one thing I could do is to let one access the option tables you can alter with [Un]Set FooBar [int|string] but it is a bit unclear to me how to make one register options here... I mean, it should be done only once and in one place... I'll have to check if this is possible.

@pi8027
Copy link
Member Author

pi8027 commented Oct 6, 2021

@gares Thanks. That's indeed desirable.

@pi8027
Copy link
Member Author

pi8027 commented Oct 6, 2021

@pi8027
Copy link
Member Author

pi8027 commented Oct 10, 2024

Before addressing this issue, I wish to have a cache mechanism for conversion checking (based on union-find). That would also apply to the comparisons of instances and reduce the time spent on readback.

@pi8027 pi8027 changed the title Compare subterms in the varmap by conversion or keyed matching Compare variables by conversion or keyed matching Oct 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants