css.properties.view-transition-name.match-element – Safari supports this

[bramus]

What type of issue is this?

Incorrect support data (example: BrowserX says "86" but support was added in "40")

What information was incorrect, unhelpful, or incomplete?

Safari has support for view-transition-name: match-element, but the data says it doesn’t.

What browsers does this problem apply to, if applicable?

Safari

What did you expect to see?

18.4

Did you test this? If so, how?

CSS.supports("view-transition-name: match-element")

Can you link to any release notes, bugs, pull requests, or MDN pages related to this?

https://developer.apple.com/documentation/safari-release-notes/safari-18_4-release-notes

Do you have anything more you want to share?

No response

MDN URL

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/view-transition-name#match-element

MDN metadata

No response

[github-actions]

This issue has been identified as spam and has been automatically closed. Do not use this repository for posting spam.

If you believe this issue was incorrectly classified as spam, please comment below. A maintainer will review, and reopen if necessary.

[bramus]

FYI @nt1m

Also, @caugner: this issue got marked as spam seconds after posting. This is not spam. Please reopen.

[caugner]

@queengooborg Can you please look into why this issue was marked as spam? Could the action take into consideration prior contributions to the repo?

[queengooborg]

I think the code saw that most responses were short (less than 10 character long / no response) or code/link only and assumed it was spam because of that. A fair number of spammers will fill out the issue template with junk characters, or post nothing but links and attachments for every answer, so this rule catches a good chunk of the spam that BCD gets. Unfortunately, false positives like this occur as a result.

I'll look into a way to give existing contributors a pass, whether that's completely bypassing the spam check or giving them a higher threshold!

[nt1m]

Good catch! I thought this would be something ideally caught by the BCD collector