Fix: Issue #37597

Fix: #37597

Fix: Issue #37597

Author: SurajKharkwal

files/en-us/web/css/flex-basis/index.md

@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ This example demonstrates the difference between a `flex-basis` of `0` versus a
 
 #### HTML
 
-We include two same-structure flex containers. These which will be styled similarly, except for their `flex-basis` values. The containers each have two children: a heading `<div>` and a `<section>`. The `<section>` element has a content `<div>` child, which will not be set as a flex item but will be given a height.
+We include two same-structure flex containers, which will be styled similarly except for their `flex-basis` values. The containers each have two children: a heading `<div>` and a `<section>`. The `<section>` element has a content `<div>` child, which will not be set as a flex item but will be given a height.
 
 ```html
 <div class="container basis-0">
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ We include two same-structure flex containers. These which will be styled simila
 
 #### CSS
 
-We style the containers as inline flex containers that will appear side by side to better enable comparing them. We set the `flex-direction` to the column. The first container's flex items have a `flex-basis` value of `0` and the second container's flex item have a `flex-basis` value of `0%`. Neither the flex containers nor their flex items have a height explicitly set, but the heights of `section` elements can not exceed `200px` and their children have height `300px`.
+We style the containers as inline flex containers that will appear side by side to better enable comparing them. We set the `flex-direction` to `column`. The first container's flex items have a `flex-basis` value of `0`, while the second container's flex items have a `flex-basis` value of `0%`. Neither the flex containers nor their flex items have a height explicitly set, but the heights of `section` elements cannot exceed `200px`, and their children have a height of `300px`.
 
 ```css
 .container {