You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While working with some automatically generated proofs I found that top-level disjoint variable restrictions seem to apply also before the $d statement.
In this example metamath-knife --verify complains "Distinct variable violation" on R-id, as if the $d x y $. at the end of the file was active for R-any.
$c term |- R $.
$v x y $.
x-term $f term x $.
y-term $f term y $.
R-any $a |- x R y $.
R-id $p |- x R x $= x-term x-term R-any $.
$( The offending $d may come after multiple declarations $)
$v z $.
z-term $f term z $.
padding-lemma $a |- x R x $.
$d x y $.
metamath-exe accepts the proof. Within a block metamath-knife also respects ordering, after adding ${ before R-any and $} after the $d this example metamath-knife --verify accepts the file.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
While working with some automatically generated proofs I found that top-level disjoint variable restrictions seem to apply also before the
$d
statement.In this example
metamath-knife --verify
complains "Distinct variable violation" onR-id
, as if the$d x y $.
at the end of the file was active forR-any
.metamath-exe accepts the proof. Within a block metamath-knife also respects ordering, after adding
${
beforeR-any
and$}
after the$d
this examplemetamath-knife --verify
accepts the file.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: