-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Word wrapping #6378
Comments
We are not planning to allow you to turn word wrapping off. It is on by default. Why do you want it turned off? |
Only sometimes at runtime. |
Wait could you elaborate more? Is there a specific scenario that doesn't work well with word wrap? There might be better tools or other bugs that would help more than "disabling word wrap sometimes". |
Ah okay. What you're looking for is /dup #1860 |
Hi! We've identified this issue as a duplicate of another one that already exists on this Issue Tracker. This specific instance is being closed in favor of tracking the concern over on the referenced thread. Thanks for your report! |
Both issues are closed now, however we don't have the possibility to disable the word wrap yet :( |
Not having the option to disable the wrap has made windows terminal impossible to be used on a vertical screen. |
Has this been fixed? As far as December 2024, I've search for this line wrapping option in I need it for a better organized logging display. In the following window arrangement, the logging on the left side of the screen is less readable than if it where unwrapped. An horizontal scrollbar would make working with it smoother. As as side note, as you can see from this comment in the present issue, the feature is heavily needed: |
You can follow #1860 for updates. I was planning to do it for the next release, but I'm not sure anymore that I'll be able to make it. In either case though, implementing this is one of the next things I'll do for Windows Terminal. |
Isn't it implemented yet? |
Hello,
How to Disable & Enable Word wrapping Console in Windows Terminal?
If this feature does not exist, please add it.
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: