Feedback from IANA #60
Description
Dear Authors,
Before the IETF meeting, we check working group agendas for documents with IANA-related issues. A question about the current version of this document:
Should the new registries be added to an existing registry group like “QUIC” (at https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.iana.org/assignments/quic__;!!GjvTz_vk!UDiIapP6JF2wuoJe1n7lmSjTOZq_IsOjjoYYTLn1d0dfy-gwzXpaGbX1M8IBMOUersbQc9BIJrCY_TgIt-XSTRQ$ ), or should IANA create a new registry group with a name like “Media over QUIC (MOQ)”? (I have no idea whether this is actually an appropriate name.)
This could be addressed by making a change like this:
OLD: This document creates a new registry, "MoQ Streaming Format Type”’ in Section 5.1
NEW: This document creates a new registry called "MoQ Streaming Format Types" in a new “Media over QUIC (MoQ)” registry group.
OR: This document creates a new registry called "MoQ Streaming Format Types" and adds it to the "foo” registry group.
Also, about the reference field in Section 5.1: we would ordinarily expect to list the document that creates the registry (or that reserves the codepoint) in that field.
If you have any questions, just let us know. If you'd like to talk in person, you can find us next to the RFC Editor's table from Monday through Thursday. You can also request another review at any time by contacting us at [email protected].
For more information about IANA Considerations section requirements, please see