Update #15
Description
I just pushed a few changes:
-
Changed use-case to use case throughout the whole paper to establish a consistent notation (change this if you prefer use-case)
-
Added a few more lines to section 2.5 in order to address the reviewers remarks as stated in the review.
All in all I must say that you (mostly ingo and severin) did a great job on rephrasing, shifting the scope of this version. IMHO the paper reads smoothly and the scope is much clearer now. Good job. I have no further remarks to add. Close this if you agree.