Skip to content

Don't require field-only classes to be mockable. #75

@droeh

Description

@droeh

Currently we require classes to not be final and to have a public or protected constructor so that they can be mocked; for field-only classes this is an unnecessary requirement, as there's no situation where mocking should be necessary.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions