Skip to content

Commit c6ad03b

Browse files
committed
Fix typos and add clarify language
Signed-off-by: Marcello Seri <[email protected]>
1 parent 66cde3c commit c6ad03b

File tree

1 file changed

+11
-12
lines changed

1 file changed

+11
-12
lines changed

2b-submanifolds.tex

Lines changed: 11 additions & 12 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ \section{Inverse function theorem}
5252
\end{exercise}
5353

5454
Note that this theorem can fail for manifold with boundary.
55-
A counterexample\footnote{Exercise: why?} is given by the inclusion map $\cH^n \hookrightarrow \R^n$.
55+
A counterexample\footnote{Exercise: why?} is given by the inclusion map $\cH^n \hookrightarrow \R^n$.
5656

5757
An important observation at this point is that the rank of the mapping
5858
is a crucial property in the inverse function theorem and it is really a
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ \section{Inverse function theorem}
8484

8585
\begin{proof}
8686
We start with two important observations.
87-
87+
8888
\newthought{First}. The statement is local on charts: without loss of generality,
8989
we can fix local coordinates on $M$ and $N$ respectively centred around $p$ and $F(p)$
9090
and replace them altogether by two open subsets $U\subseteq \R^m$ and $V \subseteq \R^n$.
@@ -105,15 +105,15 @@ \section{Inverse function theorem}
105105

106106
\newthought{Right hand side}.
107107
Writing $F(x,y) = (Q(x,y), R(x,y))$ for some smooth maps $Q: U \to \R^k$ and $R: U \to \R^{n-k}$,
108-
our choice of coordinates after the above observations implies that
108+
our choice of coordinates after the above observations implies that the gradient of $Q$ with respect to $x$ is regular, that is,
109109
$\det \left( \frac{\partial Q^i}{\partial x^j} \right) \neq 0$ at $(x,y) = (0,0)$.
110110

111-
Since the gradient of $Q$ with respect to $x$ is regular, we are going to extend
112-
the mapping with the identity on the rest of the coordinates to get a regular map
111+
In particular, this implies that we can extend the mapping with
112+
the identity on the rest of the coordinates to obtain a regular map
113113
on the whole neighbourhood.
114114
Let $\varphi : U \to \R^m$ be defined by $\varphi(x,y) = (Q(x,y), y)$. Then,
115115
\begin{equation}
116-
D\varphi(0,0) =
116+
D\varphi(0,0) =
117117
\begin{pmatrix}
118118
\frac{\partial Q^i}{\partial x^j}(0,0) & \frac{\partial Q^i}{\partial y^j}(0,0) \\
119119
0 & \id_{\R^{m-k}}
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ \section{Inverse function theorem}
130130
(x,y) = \varphi(A(x,y), B(x,y)) = (Q(A(x,y), B(x,y)), B(x,y)).
131131
\end{equation}
132132
That is, $B(x,y) = y$ and therefore $\varphi^{-1}(x,y) = (A(x,y), y)$.
133-
Moreover, $\varphi \circ \varphi^{-1} = \id$ and thus $(Q(A(x,y),y) = x$.
133+
Moreover, $\varphi \circ \varphi^{-1} = \id$ and thus $Q(A(x,y),y) = x$.
134134

135135
This leaves us with
136136
\begin{equation}
@@ -152,11 +152,11 @@ \section{Inverse function theorem}
152152
The claim then follows from a classical theorem in linear algebra.
153153

154154
Since $\id_{\R^k}$ makes the first $k$ columns of the matrix \eqref{eq:diff_DFp-1}
155-
linearly independent, the matrix can have rank $k$ only if the derivatives
155+
linearly independent, the matrix can have rank $k$ only if the derivatives
156156
$\frac{\partial \widetilde{R}^i}{\partial y^j}$ vanish identically on $W_0$.
157157
That means that $\widetilde{R}$ is independent of the corresponding variables
158158
$(y^1, \ldots, y^{m-k})$.
159-
159+
160160
Defining $S(x) = \widetilde{R}(x, 0)$, we have
161161
\begin{equation}
162162
F\circ\varphi^{-1}(x,y) = (x, S(x)).
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ \section{Inverse function theorem}
165165
\newthought{Left hand side}.
166166
If we can find a smooth chart $\psi : V_0 \to \R^n$ in some neighbourhood $V_0$ of $(0,0)$,
167167
we will have concluded the proof.
168-
Define
168+
Define
169169
\begin{equation}
170170
\psi(u, v) = (u, v - S(u))
171171
\quad\mbox{on}\quad
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ \section{Inverse function theorem}
182182
both $V$ and $W_0$ are neighbourhoods of $(0,0)$.
183183
The first claim follows by definition of $V_0$ since that requires $(x,0)\in W_0$,
184184
which is clearly the case by setting $y=0$.
185-
185+
186186
Putting all pieces together, we get
187187
\begin{equation}
188188
\psi \circ F \circ \varphi^{-1} (x,y) = \psi(x, S(x)) = (x, S(x) - S(x)) = (x,0),
@@ -489,4 +489,3 @@ \section{Embeddings, submersions and immersions}
489489
\textit{\small Hint: Find a suitable map $F: \mathrm{Mat}(n, \R) \to \mathrm{Sym}(n)$ such that $F^{-1}(\{p\}) = O(n)$ for some point $p$ in the image, e.g. $0$ or $\id_n$.
490490
Here $\mathrm{Sym}(n)$ denotes the space of symmetric matrices.}
491491
\end{exercise}
492-

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)