Keyword workflow #205
Description
A friend suggested that the keyword workflow could be more streamlined and moved away from the heaving friction flow of opening a PR and a manual review. Imagine something like
- propose an English keyword for 🫥
- community (GitHub users?) get to vote on whether that keyword is valid
- once a keyword gathers enough vote maybe someone (well me I guess) still do a final gut check
- one button click we can use github actions to put that keyword into the json file
- another github action to publish
questions
- how many votes is enough votes?
- would this get too noisy?
- is that gut check needed?
- need What constitutes an acceptable keyword? #194 before this can happen
This seems like something https://github.com/muan/emojilib/discussions can be used for.
https://github.blog/changelog/2021-06-29-github-discussions-events-available-on-github-actions/