Replies: 5 comments 5 replies
-
That's why the scripts are used. Look at the examples. To open (go up) and close (go down) it's pretty straightforward. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@nagyrobi do you think that it would be possible to modify the behaviour of this custom component in order to do not modify the status of the script immediately after the stop script is executed, but at the end of the stop script execution? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I don't think binary sensor is suitable in this case. What about if someone
press stop and the cover is already stopped?
Why the cover status is modified as soon as the stop script will be
executed?
Il ven 30 apr 2021, 22:21 nagyrobi ***@***.***> ha scritto:
… You should adjust the scripts properly as @Pulpyyyy
<https://github.com/Pulpyyyy> suggests, by employing a binary sensor
which can be True if opening and False if closing. And based on that you
can program the logic.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#25 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/APZCFFVFEJCM7IRC7EB7K4TTLMGNXANCNFSM4ZT3STVQ>
.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Or maybe you should check the original version: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Here is what i've done
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi,
Could the component be extended to allow sending a command "twice" instead of "up/down + stop"
I do have a dual relay to manage some of my shutters :
R1 signal => shutter goes up
R1 signal again => shutter stops
R2 signal => shutter goes down
R2 signal again => shutter stops
It is mandatory to send a second signal to stop the motor, otherwise it overloads
Mixing R1/R2 signals should be avoid.
Regards
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions