Replies: 3 comments
-
Charge periods are currently supported. For discharge, see #440. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Sorry missed that thread.
Thanks
E!
…________________________________
From: Antony Male ***@***.***>
Sent: 23 December 2023 18:08
To: nathanmarlor/foxess_modbus ***@***.***>
Cc: ERIC MCELROY ***@***.***>; Author ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [nathanmarlor/foxess_modbus] Addition of charge/discharge scheduling (Discussion #481)
Charge periods are currently supported. For discharge, see #440<#440>.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#481 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A4PJ5YXIJV6DQOP64OVDXITYK4MYZAVCNFSM6AAAAABBA6FI72VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43SRDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHM3TSMZVGAZDK>.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Duplicated with #440 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Could you please update me with any plans to update the FoxESS_modbus to include options for scheduled charging/discharging to the grid for compatibility with FoxESS Firmware 1.70 to eliminate the need to use the FoxESS Cloud v2 & the FoxESS web interface?
It would also be great if you could build in the individual cell temperatures & individual cell mV?
Thanks in advance.
E!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions