You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We discovered, that fastq files downloaded from NCBI SRA via fasterq_dump are different to the ENA stored fastq files. After some digging, this is probably due to the --clip option.
In general, without reproducing the options used, you can't compare the result of two runs of fastq-dump or fasterq-dump. Does EBI document what options they used when generating the fastq file you downloaded from them?
Is there a reason you need clipping in fasterq-dump besides reproducing the file from EBI?
We discovered, that fastq files downloaded from NCBI SRA via fasterq_dump are different to the ENA stored fastq files. After some digging, this is probably due to the
--clip
option.Example downloaded from: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/DRR010705
Default download via fasterq_dump
Unfortunately, there seems to be no
clip
parameter for fasterq-dump.Any idea how to generate identical reads as the ones stored in ENA ?
See also: galaxyproject/tools-iuc#6171 as we're trying to use that for Galaxy.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: