- ubuntu 18.04
- nvidia Tesla T4 gpu, driver newer than 440
- cuda 10.2, cudnn 8
- cmake 3.10.2
- opencv built from source
- tensorrt 7.2.3.4
I export the model like this:
$ python tools/export_onnx.py --config configs/bisenetv2_city.py --weight-path /path/to/your/model.pth --outpath ./model.onnx
NOTE: I use cropsize of 1024x2048
here in my example, you should change it according to your specific application. The inference cropsize is fixed from this step on, so you should decide the inference cropsize when you export the model here.
Just use the standard cmake build method:
mkdir -p tensorrt/build
cd tensorrt/build
cmake ..
make
This would generate a ./segment
in the tensorrt/build
directory.
If you can successfully compile the source code, you can parse the onnx model to tensorrt model like this:
$ ./segment compile /path/to/onnx.model /path/to/saved_model.trt
If your gpu support acceleration with fp16 inferenece, you can add a --fp16
option to in this step:
$ ./segment compile /path/to/onnx.model /path/to/saved_model.trt --fp16
Note that I use the simplest method to parse the command line args, so please do Not change the order of the above command.
Run inference like this:
$ ./segment run /path/to/saved_model.trt /path/to/input/image.jpg /path/to/saved_img.jpg
The speed depends on the specific gpu platform you are working on, you can test the fps on your gpu like this:
$ ./segment test /path/to/saved_model.trt
-
Since tensorrt 7.0.0 cannot parse well thebilinear interpolation
op exported from pytorch, I replace them with pytorchnn.PixelShuffle
, which would bring some performance overhead(more flops and parameters), and make inference a bit slower. Also due to thenn.PixelShuffle
op, you must export the onnx model with input size to be n times of 32.
If you are using 7.2.3.4, you should not have problem withinterpolate
anymore. -
There would be some problem for tensorrt 7.0.0 to parse thenn.AvgPool2d
op from pytorch with onnx opset11. So I use opset10 to export the model.
Likewise, you do not need to worry about this anymore with 7.2.3.4. -
The speed(fps) is tested on a single nvidia Tesla T4 gpu with
batchsize=1
andcropsize=(1024,2048)
. Please note that T4 gpu is almost 2 times slower than 2080ti, you should evaluate the speed considering your own platform and cropsize. Also note that the performance would be affected if your gpu is concurrently working on other tasks. Please make sure no other program is running on your gpu when you test the speed. -
On my platform, after compiling with tensorrt, the model size of bisenetv1 is 29Mb(fp16) and 128Mb(fp32), and the size of bisenetv2 is 16Mb(fp16) and 42Mb(fp32). However, the fps of bisenetv1 is 68(fp16) and 23(fp32), while the fps of bisenetv2 is 59(fp16) and 21(fp32). It is obvious that bisenetv2 has fewer parameters than bisenetv1, but the speed is otherwise. I am not sure whether it is because tensorrt has worse optimization strategy in some ops used in bisenetv2(such as depthwise convolution) or because of the limitation of the gpu on different ops. Please tell me if you have better idea on this.