Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Site Groups are missing VLAN and VM related objects #18881

Open
artiomello opened this issue Mar 12, 2025 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #18932
Open

Site Groups are missing VLAN and VM related objects #18881

artiomello opened this issue Mar 12, 2025 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #18932
Assignees
Labels
severity: low Does not significantly disrupt application functionality, or a workaround is available status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application

Comments

@artiomello
Copy link

Deployment Type

Self-hosted

NetBox Version

v.4.2.4

Python Version

3.10

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Create a Site Group "Example Site Group"
  2. Create a VLAN group "Example VLAN Group" with scope "DCIM > Site Group"
  3. Assign the VLAN group to the "Example Site Group"
  4. Create the VLAN group
  5. Go to Site Groups
  6. See that there is no reference to any VLANs or VLAN groups even though it's literally the only parent object that has been selected for the created VLAN group

Expected Behavior

Site groups should reference the same related objects as Sites, and not just a subset of them. That way it would be not only useful but also possible to see all:

  • VLANs
  • VLAN Groups
  • Virtual Machines
  • ASNs
  • Clusters
  • Devices

that are present within a Site Group.

Observed Behavior

Here's a screenshot of a Site's related objects, that is part of a Site Group:

Image

Note the highlighted related objects.

Now, here's a screenshot of a Site Group's (where the above Site is a member of) related objects:

Image

Notice the following objects mising:

  • VLANs
  • VLAN Groups
  • Virtual Machines
  • ASNs
  • Clusters
  • Devices
@artiomello artiomello added status: needs triage This issue is awaiting triage by a maintainer type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application labels Mar 12, 2025
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation severity: low Does not significantly disrupt application functionality, or a workaround is available and removed status: needs triage This issue is awaiting triage by a maintainer labels Mar 13, 2025
@renatoalmeidaoliveira
Copy link
Collaborator

Blocked by #18933 and #18939

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
severity: low Does not significantly disrupt application functionality, or a workaround is available status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants