Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

(From Eliot Lear) Implication on existing ACL augmentations #2

Open
boucadair opened this issue Jan 17, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

(From Eliot Lear) Implication on existing ACL augmentations #2

boucadair opened this issue Jan 17, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
I-D_Text Add text to the draft to clarify the concern revive_when_core_spec_stable Will be reassessed when the core spec is stable.

Comments

@boucadair
Copy link
Collaborator

I have no objections to the WG adopting this, but I do have a question
about augmentations of the earlier ACL model. Should those
augmentations be updated if this work is approved?

(initially here: oscargdd/draft-dbb-netmod-enhanced-acl#4)
@boucadair boucadair mentioned this issue Jan 17, 2023
Closed
@oscargdd
Copy link
Collaborator

In the draft we need to add pointers to other extensions. Action point to collect current RFCs with ACL augmentations.

@oscargdd
Copy link
Collaborator

Check https://yangcatalog.org/yang-search/impact_analysis/ietf-packet-fields@2019-03-04 to document current augments and asses the impact

@boucadair boucadair added revive_when_core_spec_stable Will be reassessed when the core spec is stable. I-D_Text Add text to the draft to clarify the concern labels Feb 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
I-D_Text Add text to the draft to clarify the concern revive_when_core_spec_stable Will be reassessed when the core spec is stable.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@oscargdd @boucadair