You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A proposal: we state that we ignore build metadata, but our compat identifier and pre-release metadata is used. While names could be long, what if we stick to those for purposes of naming. That is, build metadata is excluded, but compat identifier and pre-release metadata are required for filenaming.
We don't allow 3.0.1 and 3.0.1_compatible to both exist.
Should we allow 3.0.1+build11 and 3.0.1+build12 to both exist?
Do we want X.Y.Z to be a complete distinguisher for a module version?
As a corollary: what parts of the YANG Semver would go into the filename?
X.Y.Z?
X.Y.Z_COMPAT?
X.Y.Z_COMPAT+metadata? (could be very long)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: