Consider renaming marseille-rootlets to cervical-marseille

[valosekj]

As discussed with @NathanMolinier and @jcohenadad on Slack, dataset names should mainly reflect the site, the FOV and possibly the pathology. In this sense, we could rename the marseille-rootlets dataset to cervical-marseille. This would also better match with the recently added lumbar-marseille (#325).

[jcohenadad]

Most of our dataset covers the cervical cord, so it's a bit weird to start the name with 'cervical'. According to this logic we should rename 90% of dataset with 'cervical-xxx'.

Is there anything more specific about this dataset? Eg contrast, pathology, etc.

if healthy control, we could consider naming it hc-marseille as we started doing (eg for #323)

[valosekj]

Most of our dataset covers the cervical cord, so it's a bit weird to start the name with 'cervical'. According to this logic we should rename 90% of dataset with 'cervical-xxx'.

Fair point. Agree.

Is there anything more specific about this dataset? Eg contrast, pathology, etc.

if healthy control, we could consider naming it hc-marseille as we started doing (eg for #323)

The dataset contains HC only. The images are 3T T2w covering the C spine.

I did a quick search on our git-annex server and found that we also have marseille-3t-mp2rage. So maybe we could use hc-marseille-t2w? Or hc-marseille-3t-t2w (to make explicit that the data is 3T)?

[jcohenadad]

hc-marseille-3t-t2w is nice