We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Currently we rely on a no-default package option when there is no known package in nixpkgs for a none-ls, efmls, or LSP server.
This results in a fairly generic error:
error: The option `plugins.lsp.servers.<name>.package' was accessed but has no value defined. Try setting the option.
Instead we should handle these cases with our own custom assertion so that we can provide a more useful error message.
See prior discussion in #2405
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
plugins.lsp.servers.prismals.package
lsp.servers.ocamllsp
kulala-ls
No branches or pull requests
Currently we rely on a no-default package option when there is no known package in nixpkgs for a none-ls, efmls, or LSP server.
This results in a fairly generic error:
Instead we should handle these cases with our own custom assertion so that we can provide a more useful error message.
See prior discussion in #2405
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: