Skip to content

ModelMethod naming consistency #262

@JFRudzinski

Description

@JFRudzinski

My preliminary though is the current implementation in #237 is best, it is effectively TypeModelMethod but we drop the Method for conciseness. In some cases e.g., ForceField() I would even want to drop Model, although I am open to putting it back in.

To the point about ModelMethodElectronic, I agree we should change it for consistency... ElectronicModel? Although, here we are talking about an abstract class I think, the shortened "natural" form is more important for the used classes IMO

@ladinesa @EBB2675 FYI

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions