Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG] Please clarify license (MIT or ISC) #30

Open
1 task done
camillem opened this issue Sep 26, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
1 task done

[BUG] Please clarify license (MIT or ISC) #30

camillem opened this issue Sep 26, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@camillem
Copy link

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Current Behavior

Licence text is MIT, but in package.json, licence field says ISC.

Expected Behavior

Licence metadata should be consistent with license text

Steps To Reproduce

  1. Open the file package.json, the "license" fields read "ISC",
  2. Open the file LICENSE : it contains the text of the MIT license

Environment

  • npm: n/a
  • Node: n/a
  • OS: n/a
  • platform: n/a
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant