[feature] Can we use both fuzzy matching & frecency scoring at the same time?

[delphinus]

From #163 & some issues, there are some demand that users want to use fuzzy matching for frecency results. The current build allows to use sorters.get_substr_matcher only. That is because it is the only “sorter” that does not sort but match candidates.

If a “sorter” that fuzzy-matches and does not sort exists, it is maybe useful for them. I want to create it on trial.

[delphinus]

I added naive implementation for fuzzy-matching in #166. It simply converts prompt string, such as foobar, into regexp: f.*o.*o.*b.*a.*r to match. I tested it, but it matches too much candidates to select. I want opinions from other users.

[kirillrogovoy]

I've just discovered this project and super-grateful for your effort!

The first thing I stumbled across was not matching stuff with fuzzy searches. By now, it's deeply ingrained in my brain to just type 2-4-letter pieces to find the file (serpy for server.py) which works fantastically well with built-in searches.

This would be a single most impactful improvement for me.

[delphinus]

I see. I tried #166 and didn't feel much useful. But it is a good idea that users can select “fuzzy” or “unfuzzy” matcher in config. I will implement that.

-- such as this way?
telescope.setup {
  extensions = {
    frecency = {
      matcher = "fuzzy" -- acceptable: "default" / "fuzzy"
    },
  },
}

[delphinus]

Now I'm testing a matcher: fuzzy in #166. This matcher only matches the pattern to basename only. I also created a matcher: fuzzy_full, to match full paths, but this matches too much candidates to narrow ones to select, I think.

I will use #166 for dog-fooding for a while.

[good-idea]

Question - would this feature solve what I'm looking for below?

I have a directory like:

src/lib/sanity.ts
src/lib/types.ts

I'd like to be able to type libsan to match src/lib/sanity.ts, but currently that does not work:

Instead, I need to include the /, i.e. lib/san:

This example is simple - but my project is quite large and i'm not always going to remember the full path nor want to type it out. For instance, typing comsch would ideally match src/components/ui/forms/schedule.tsx

[delphinus]

Yes. fuzzy_full matcher makes good for your use case. But this has a side effect, that is, it matches against candidates you probably have not intended.

# your input “libsan” matches below.
/path/to/www/src/lib/sanity.ts
# also this matches: `Lib……S……A……N` => “libsan”
/Users/foo/Library/Some/Arbitrary/Nice/project.ts

This is why I am hesitating to include this feature into frecency. There is two ways to reduce this inconvenience.

1. Limit candidates to a certain project by workspace feature.
   • Do :Telescope frecency workspace=Foo makes it show candidates only in Foo project.
   • You can always do this with default_workspace option. For example, default_workspace = "CWD" makes you always see candadidates from your current working directory.
2. Use fuzzy matcher instead of fuzzy_full.
   • This only matches your input against the basename of paths.

Do you want to use this feature even with these points?

[kirillrogovoy]

Just a few thoughts:

1. Some/Arbitrary/Nice/project.ts is maybe not so arbitrary if it has a frecency score, right? :)
2. The fuzzy matcher isn't changing the sorting, right? So the most frecent file will still be closer to the cursor? So even though some random undesired files will match, it might not be a problem in practice.
3. As the escape hatch, maybe you could expose a setting to override the scoring function fn (frecency_score, fuzzy_score) -> final_score which essentially redefines sorting. For those who want more control over how much each score affects the final sequence of files.

[delphinus]

1. Yes. No. It probably is not arbitrary, that is, you should have opened the file many times in such case.
2. Also yes. No, it doesn’t change the order with the current implementaion. In my env, it makes too much noises to select one, but this is because my DB is so huge, maybe.
3. It seems nice. fuzzy_full will match well for almost users, and some users that has huge DB, like me, should use the func. I will try to add that.

—

edited.

Sorry, I’ve mistaken yes/no at the first time because I use yes against negative questions when I agree in my native language, Japanese.;)

[good-idea]

Do you want to use this feature even with these points?

1. Some/Arbitrary/Nice/project.ts is maybe not so arbitrary if it has a frecency score, right? :)

Yes - that would be fine. Plus, once I actually navigate to lib/sanity a couple of times, it will rank higher on the frecency score anyways - so /Library/Some/Arbitrary/Nice/project.ts showing up in the results wouldn't be an issue.

[delphinus]

I've updated #166. The current logic calculates scores with recency and fzy implemented by telescope.algos.fzy. It seems to work good for me. Still testing.

[delphinus]

It works well in my env. I merged #166 and added matcher = "fuzzy". Do not hesitate to reopen here when you all want to discuss further.

[kirillrogovoy]

Awesome, thanks a lot @delphinus!

For the reference, here's the config that does what I was looking for:

frecency = {
  matcher = "fuzzy",
  scoring_function = function(recency, fzy_score)
    return -recency
  end
}

It seems to only filter the list while the order still depends ONLY on the recency score. So now I basically use either of two file searches: fuzzy only (default telescope find_files with rg in my case) or frecency only.

I found that mixing the two leads to unpredictable sorting on every character I type (at least in my experience, ymmv).

Will keep it like that for a week to see if there's more to it. 🙌