Renders over the statusline

[JulianNymark]

Description

status line seems to gets covered by the context at the bottom.

Here it is normally (showing the filename)

Would be nice to maybe set a custom offset from top & bottom for where to start rendering the context scope? (this would solve the setup for any users strange setup / status line that might take up N number of lines at either the top or the bottom? 💭

Neovim version

NVIM v0.11.1 Build type: Release LuaJIT 2.1.1744318430

Expected behavior

It should only render the context within the "text area" of the window? (I don't have the correct grammar for the different parts / anatomy of vim/nvim 😅 ). Ignoring headers and or footers (status lines).

Actual behavior

Does render above other elements.

Minimal config

I'll get to this later (currently at work so I don't have time to do it right away, but submitting this so I don't forget about it)

I know this could mean that it's actually a problem with any other plugin / combination of plugins, so until this is done, take the issue with a grain of salt.

Steps to reproduce

I'll get to this later (currently at work so I don't have time to do it right away, but submitting this so I don't forget about it)

I know this could mean that it's actually a problem with any other plugin / combination of plugins, so until this is done, take the issue with a grain of salt.

[lewis6991]

I'm pretty sure contexts aren't drawn at the bottom of the window. Only one window is opened. Are you sure it is this plugin?

[isakbm]

This likely happens because nvim-treesitter-context is implemented using a floating window, and there is nothing that prevents a floating window from covering the statusline.

I can most likely easily patch this if it is of interest @lewis6991

[lewis6991]

But the issue report indicates the floating window is at the bottom of the window, which it shouldn't be.

[isakbm]

I think it can happen if the code-buffer-window is not that tall, and if the context-window is allowed to grow very large.

[lewis6991]

That's not what the OP indicates in the screenshots. Rather than speculating we need the OP to clarify, otherwise I'll just close this issue.

If you've got fixes you want to make independent of this issue then feel free to raise PR's.