Clarify if `and`, `or`, `xor`, and `not`, are bitwise or logical

[aabounegm]

At the end of section 3 (Bytes), there is the following quote:

There are also attributes for bitwise operations: ★and, ★or, ★xor, ★not, ★left, and ★right.

Which implies that not is the bitwise complement operation, and that and/or/xor also operate bitwise.
For example, not 00-00 would be FF-FF.

However, on the same page, towards the end of subsection 4.2 (Bool), there is the following

The not attribute is a Boolean inversion. Attributes and, or, xor are logical conjunction, disjunction, and exclusive disjunction of the object itself with an a array of other Boolean values.

Which implies that these operations are logical (meaning they operate only on true/false values).
For example, not of 00-00 would be 00-01.

Which of these variants is the correct one?

And as an additional question, what is meant by "an a array of other Boolean values"? Do these operations accept an array as an argument or just one other value?

[yegor256]

@maxonfjvipon can you please help

[maxonfjvipon]

@aabounegm

1. we don't have bool anymore, there are true and false objects (read this). We'll fix the paper soon
2. bytes.and and true.and are different objects. bytes.and is bitwise "and", true.and is logical "and"

[aabounegm]

Yes I remember that blog post. So it's safe to assume that all of those operators (with their respective atoms listed here) are bitwise, correct?

[maxonfjvipon]

@aabounegm and, or, xor, not - yes, bitwise

[aabounegm]

Understood, thank you. Feel free to close the issue or keep it open until the paper is updated

[yegor256]

@maxonfjvipon let's update the paper and then close the issue