You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the Observations section of README.md, it is stated that:
As expected Armadillo with internal BLAS/LAPACK wrappers performance is pretty poor.
This is incorrect, as the meaning of the "internal wrapper" is wrong. There is either a wrapper for an external library, or there isn't. A re-implementation of a function is not an "internal" wrapper, but simply internal functionality. The correct wording for the quoted problematic statement should be:
Armadillo without the use of OpenBLAS or MKL wrappers obtains poor performance. However, when the wrappers for OpenBLAS or MKL are enabled within Armadillo, the performance is virtually the same as for the other libraries.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the
Observations
section of README.md, it is stated that:This is incorrect, as the meaning of the "internal wrapper" is wrong. There is either a wrapper for an external library, or there isn't. A re-implementation of a function is not an "internal" wrapper, but simply internal functionality. The correct wording for the quoted problematic statement should be:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: