-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reduce dependency footprint #9
Comments
It's possible. I don't use this plugin actively. Have you tried it? |
It should work. We did something similar with the s3 plugin. We would accept a PR if you give it a try and it works.
… On 30 Aug 2017, at 11:53, Michael Drogalis ***@***.***> wrote:
It's possible. I don't use this plugin actively. Have you tried it?
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
Cool. I'll submit a PR as soon as I'm confident it's working. Right now, I'm just doing this in my
|
Okay, I've submitted a PR here: #10. Everything seems to be working. I'll let you know if I find anything awry. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Right now, this plugin is pulling in all of the aws-java-sdk libraries just to do work with SQS. Is it possible to just require
aws-java-sdk-sqs
thereby reducing the dependency footprint?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: